Showing posts with label Electronic Records Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electronic Records Management. Show all posts

Sunday, December 16, 2012

University Websites Must Allow for Difference of Opinion

In "3 idioms reveal the truth about university websites" (13 December 2012), Dey Alexander argues that universities need a single coordinated web presence, not just a collection of sub-sites and there should be a clear boundary between what is boundary between internal and external content. However, universities are not corporations devoted to profit, they intended to educate and produce new knowledge, which requires differing views to be debated.

Education and research require that different views of the world be explored, debated and tested. There cannot be one central unified view on what is true at at university: everything has to be open to debate. The World Wide Web was developed by researchers in order to foster new knowledge. Unlike previous online information systems, it was designed to allow for diversity of view, not having any single point of control and allowing documents to be created ad-hoc. Tim Berners-Lee , the inventor of the World Wide Web will be speaking at the Australian National University in Canberra, 31 January 2013.

Here are the functions of the Australian National University, as set down in legislation:

(a)  advancing and transmitting knowledge, by undertaking research and teaching of the highest quality;
(b)  encouraging, and providing facilities for, research and postgraduate study, both generally and in relation to subjects of national importance to Australia;
(c)  providing facilities and courses for higher education generally, including education appropriate to professional and other occupations, for students from within Australia and overseas;
(d)  providing facilities and courses at higher education level and other levels in the visual and performing arts, and, in so doing, promoting the highest standards of practice in those fields;
(e)  awarding and conferring degrees, diplomas and certificates in its own right or jointly with other institutions, as determined by the Council;
(f)  providing opportunities for persons, including those who already have post‑secondary qualifications, to obtain higher education qualifications;
(g)  engaging in extension activities.
(2)  In the performance of its functions, the University must pay attention to its national and international roles and to the needs of the Australian Capital Territory and the surrounding regions. ...

From section 5, Functions of the University,

In universities, as in the corporate world and in government, individuals are not free to publish whatever they like. There are rules as to what you can say as a member of the organisation. However, academics are given a level of freedom to express their views. Unlike company employees and public servants, academics are encouraged to speak publicly on areas within their area of expertise. There is no requirement for an academic to seek approval for what they say, but with that freedom comes responsibility.
Academic Freedom
  1. The University recognises the concept and practice of academic freedom as central to the proper conduct of teaching, research and scholarship.
  2. Academic and general staff are expected to use this freedom in a manner that is consistent with a responsible and honest search for knowledge and its dissemination.
  3. Academic freedom does not extend to behaviour that is harassing, disruptive and intimidating or that interferes with the academic or work performance or freedom of others ...

    From: ANU Code of Conduct, Policy 200103912, Vice-Chancellor , Australian National University, 26 March 2012

The situation with government is not that different to academics. While there are more secrets for public servants to keep, there is still an obligation to release information. In 2010, the then Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Lindsay Tanner, issued a "Declaration of Open Government" via a Blog. Freedom of Information legislation, overseen by the  Australian Information Commissioner. The most tangible change is the release of government information under a Creative Commons Licence. What has yet to change is a culture of rigid hierarchical control and hoarding of public information, prevalent in much of the public service. Ironically, during my time working as a civilian in the Defence Department, I found that the military personnel were better equipped to deal with distributed decision making than the public servants, as the military trains it officers to consult, decide and then act.

Open Government, like education and research at universities, is something which requires differing views to be expressed within reasonable bounds. Australian universities, in particular the ANU, had a key role in introducing the web to government. They can again have a key role in fostering a more open and efficient form of government. These techniques will be increasingly applicable to the corporate world as well. With the ubiquity of the Internet and rapid distribution of information, companies do not have the luxury of waiting for a rigid hierarchy to make decisions.

There will be an Open Government  Min-Conference, at the ANU in Canberra, 29 January 2013, as part of Linux Conference 2013.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Australian Government Digital Transition Policy

Greetings from Canberra, where the National Archives of Australia (NAA) are explaining the new "Australian Government Digital Transition Policy". This requires records to be archived electronically from 2016. NAA are running  "Digital Edge workshops" to help agencies implement the new policy. It should be noted that it is not just government departments subject to archives policy, for example the Australian National University (ANU) is subject to the Archives Act.

The NAA presenter mentioned there is a gap between short in-service training courses and the formal studies offered by universities. In response I am looking at revamping my online course "Electronic Document and Records Management" (COMP7420) at the Australian National University. This will be available to students doing traditional degrees in business and computing.

Also ANU  students can make up their own program using ANU Graduate Studies Select. As part of this I am looking at how to satisfy the formal requirements of professional bodies such as Records and Information Management Professionals Australasia (RIMPA), while remaining flexible.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Digital Recordkeeping Transition

Greetings from the Transitioning to Digital Recordkeeping conference in Canberra. I am chairing the opening morning of the conference and then speaking on Records in the Cloud tomorrow morning. The hash tag for the conference is #digitaltrans and I have invited the audience to discuss the topics on-line.

Some issues so far:
  1. Common recordkeeping standards where activities span government and non-government sectors, such as education.
  2. Common Australian and NZ standards? An example could be Australia adopting the Cloud Computing Code of Practice from Institute of IT Professionals NZ.
  3. What perspective are systems built from?
  4. Should government RMS be centralized?
The first speaker is John Roberts, Director Client Capability at Archives New Zealand.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Digital Recordkeeping in the Cloud

The conference Transitioning to Digital Recordkeeping, opens in Canberra on 18 September 2012. I will be chairing the opening day with Cathy Meynell-James from the Victorian Government VERS Project. The next day I will be speaking on "Records in the Cloud?", discussing how cloud computing impacts digital records management.

Agenda

18 September 2012

8:30 Registration, coffee & networking

9:00 Welcome remarks from the Chair

LEAD AGENCY PROGRESS

9:10 Becoming the New Zealand Government’s Digital Archive

  • How Archives New Zealand is transforming the whole business and bringing paper records along for the ride
  • How becoming part of the ICT landscape, working closely with others and being open to a range of options is crucial for successful digital archiving

Greg Goulding, Chief Archivist & General Manager, Archives New Zealand

9:50 The VERS journey & managing challenges around Cloud Computing, mobile technology & social media

  • About VERS (Victorian Electronic Record Strategy) and the journey from the early years to the present day
  • How current challenges (Cloud Computing, mobile technology, social media) are being managed, from a State Archives perspective

Cathy Meynell-James, Senior Manager, VERS Project, Public Records Office Victoria

PREPARING FOR DIGITISATION

10:30 The development of the Australian commercial records management industry

  • Records management principles vs. practices
  • Is hardcopy document management a thing of the past?
  • Property is still king
  • From storage to service

Derryk Guyer, Sales Director, Grace Records Management

11:00 Morning tea & networking

11:30 Getting over the physical hurdles

  • Simplifying electronic signatures/authorisation of documents
  • Effectively scanning documents and legally disposing of the originals
  • Transitioning from shared network drives to EDRMS

Shane Martin, Assistant Director, Information Management, Therapeutic Goods Administration

12:10 Implementing an EDRMS & preparing for digitisation

  • How to manage an implementation
  • Lessons learned from EDRMS implementations
  • The role of governance in embracing digitisation

Sheryl Mapp, Manager, Information Management Division, Reserve Bank of Australia

12:50 Networking lunch

1:50 Improving presentation to the user & business context in EDRMS version control

  • How to overcome the weaknesses of traditional ERMS version control – presentation to the user and lack of business context – for more effective digital recordkeeping

Stephen Bedford, Information Management Special Projects, Department of Finance & Services, NSW

2:30 Is a paperless government really achievable?

  • Can we achieve a paperless government in the context of the many critical and competing demands facing government organisations?
  • How securely automating the capture, processing and archiving of documents can increase efficiency, reduce costs and paper, improve services and see organisations become leaner and greener

Mike Waring, Vice President, Software & Solutions Sales, Australia and New Zealand, Kofax

2:50 Roundtable Discussions

3:30 Afternoon tea & networking

CHANGE MANAGEMENT

4:00 Transitioning in the geographically diverse Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade

  • The journey so far and the change management processes required to be effective
  • The elements of DFAT’s success – from business drivers to an effective communications strategy, tailored training and the approach taken to the roll out and document migrations

Kathy Nelson, Director Corporate Records Section, Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade

4:40 Engaging users to ensure success

  • About the department’s Records Management Strategy
  • The important role a renewed focus on governance, systems, training and compliance has on success
  • How the department is engaging with stakeholders to ensure improvements

Kye O’Donnell, Records Manager, Department of Justice, VIC

5:20 Closing remarks from the Chair & close of day one

19th September, 2012

8:30 Registration, coffee & networking

9:00 Welcome remarks from the Chair and recap of day one

MAKING THE TRANSITION

9:10 Making the transition in the Defence environment

  • Defence’s journey so far
  • How the department is managing the people/culture side of the transition

Andrew Garland, Director Records Management Policy, Department of Defence

9:50 Records in the Cloud?

  • Open access
  • Finding Information
  • Web friendly document formats
  • Enabling Government 2.0
Day 1 Agenda Tuesday 18th September, 2012

8:30 Registration, coffee & networking

9:00 Welcome remarks from the Chair

LEAD AGENCY PROGRESS

9:10 Becoming the New Zealand Government’s Digital Archive

  • How Archives New Zealand is transforming the whole business and bringing paper records along for the ride
  • How becoming part of the ICT landscape, working closely with others and being open to a range of options is crucial for successful digital archiving

Greg Goulding, Chief Archivist & General Manager, Archives New Zealand

9:50 The VERS journey & managing challenges around Cloud Computing, mobile technology & social media

  • About VERS (Victorian Electronic Record Strategy) and the journey from the early years to the present day
  • How current challenges (Cloud Computing, mobile technology, social media) are being managed, from a State Archives perspective

Cathy Meynell-James, Senior Manager, VERS Project, Public Records Office Victoria

PREPARING FOR DIGITISATION

10:30 The development of the Australian commercial records management industry

  • Records management principles vs. practices
  • Is hardcopy document management a thing of the past?
  • Property is still king
  • From storage to service

Derryk Guyer, Sales Director, Grace Records Management

11:00 Morning tea & networking

11:30 Getting over the physical hurdles

  • Simplifying electronic signatures/authorisation of documents
  • Effectively scanning documents and legally disposing of the originals
  • Transitioning from shared network drives to EDRMS

Shane Martin, Assistant Director, Information Management, Therapeutic Goods Administration

12:10 Implementing an EDRMS & preparing for digitisation

  • How to manage an implementation
  • Lessons learned from EDRMS implementations
  • The role of governance in embracing digitisation

Sheryl Mapp, Manager, Information Management Division, Reserve Bank of Australia

12:50 Networking lunch

1:50 Improving presentation to the user & business context in EDRMS version control

  • How to overcome the weaknesses of traditional ERMS version control – presentation to the user and lack of business context – for more effective digital recordkeeping

Stephen Bedford, Information Management Special Projects, Department of Finance & Services, NSW

2:30 Is a paperless government really achievable?

  • Can we achieve a paperless government in the context of the many critical and competing demands facing government organisations?
  • How securely automating the capture, processing and archiving of documents can increase efficiency, reduce costs and paper, improve services and see organisations become leaner and greener

Mike Waring, Vice President, Software & Solutions Sales, Australia and New Zealand, Kofax

2:50 Roundtable Discussions

3:30 Afternoon tea & networking

CHANGE MANAGEMENT

4:00 Transitioning in the geographically diverse Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade

  • The journey so far and the change management processes required to be effective
  • The elements of DFAT’s success – from business drivers to an effective communications strategy, tailored training and the approach taken to the roll out and document migrations

Kathy Nelson, Director Corporate Records Section, Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade

4:40 Engaging users to ensure success

  • About the department’s Records Management Strategy
  • The important role a renewed focus on governance, systems, training and compliance has on success
  • How the department is engaging with stakeholders to ensure improvements

Kye O’Donnell, Records Manager, Department of Justice, VIC

5:20 Closing remarks from the Chair & close of day one

Day 2 Agenda Wednesday 19th September, 2012

8:30 Registration, coffee & networking

9:00 Welcome remarks from the Chair and recap of day one

MAKING THE TRANSITION

9:10 Making the transition in the Defence environment

  • Defence’s journey so far
  • How the department is managing the people/culture side of the transition

Andrew Garland, Director Records Management Policy, Department of Defence

9:50 Records in the Cloud?

  • Open access
  • Finding Information
  • Web friendly document formats
  • Enabling Government 2.0

Tom Worthington, Adjunct Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University

10:30 Panel – Digital Recordkeeping in the Cloud

Leon O’Reilly, National Innovation Manager, Integrated Sales and Marketing Division, Fuji Xerox Australia Tom Worthington, Adjunct Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University

11:00 Morning tea & networking

11:30 Laying the groundwork, dealing with challenges & making it happen

  • How DEEWR converted a major business area to digital recordkeeping and made savings of $150,000 a year
  • How to respond when the business group isn’t ‘ready to go’ – mobilising change management and additional support

Amanda Harris, Director Records & Information Management, Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations

12:10 Improving business performance through document automation

  • How the digitisation of paper-based processes can increase efficiency and effectiveness across your organisation
  • The business areas where digital solutions can be implemented to maintain digital continuity, such as: Accounts Payable, HR, Applications Processing and other transactional based systems

Ken Macdonald, Sales Manager, Converga

MANAGING RISKS & CHALLENGES

12:30 Managing access to digital records

  • Ensuring your EDMS doesn’t lock up information unnecessarily in personal or micro silos
  • Putting in place business rules, advice and practices that balance need to know with need to share
  • Helping EDMS users to manage risk

Guy Allen, Records Manager & Agency Security Advisor, Murray-Darling Basin Authority

1:10 Networking Lunch

2:00 The critical role of user adoption in the transition to digital record keeping

  • Discover the key barriers to achieving the transition to digital records
  • Understand key strategies to increase user adoption of EDRMS Systems

Adrian Rudman, General Manager, Asia Pacific, Objective

MAKING IT HAPPEN

2:40 What we know now that we wish we knew then – reflections on DPS’ journey

  • When, why and how the DPS implemented its EDRMS
  • Key lessons learned – what we wish we knew then
  • The current state of play and what the future holds

Paul Oglethorpe, Director Knowledge Management, Department of Parliamentary Services

3:20 Afternoon tea & networking

3:40 Digital recordkeeping & disaster recovery

  • Lessons Victorian Councils learnt about Records Management during the 2009 Bushfires
  • What Yarra Ranges Council are working on to improve their response and recovery in a future emergency eve

Debbie Maggs, Information Management Archives Project Officer, Yarra Ranges Council

4:20 Victorian Local Government’s ‘Information Trek’

  • Journey to meet the overwhelming challenge of past, present and future information demands
  • ECM Step Program
  • Records Storage and Digitisation Project

Ruth Edge, Information Management Coordinator, Yarra Ranges Council

5:00 Closing remarks from the Chair & close of conference

Thursday, August 23, 2012

e-Tabling Documents for Australian Parliament by 2013

In "e-Tabling Documents for Australian Parliament" (July 28, 2012), I proposed that the Australian Parliament change its procedures to allow the tabling of electronic, rather than paper, documents. Dr Andrew Leigh MP (my local member) has replied to say that a digital repository for the Parliamentary Papers Scheme is in development. It is planned to try it later this year, with full implementation in 2013, if all goes well.

The details are in:

  1. "Inquiry into the development of a digital repository and electronic distribution of the Parliamentary Papers Series", Joint Committee on Publications, Australian Parliament, 24 June 2010
  2. Presiding Officers' – further response, Joint Committee on Publications, Australian Parliament, June 2012 (PDF 46KB)
... The Parliamentary Papers Series (PPS) is 'a comprehensive collection of information that documents public policy formulation and administration of government since Federation'. 1

It includes all the documents of a substantial nature that have been tabled in either or both the Senate and the House of Representatives, such as parliamentary committee reports but also documents provided by the executive. Although the PPS includes papers prepared by and for the executive, it is administered by the Departments of the Senate and the House of Representatives. ...

Recommendation 1
The committee recommends that an electronic PPS be developed and implemented.

Agreed. The Presiding Officers agree that a basic electronic PPS be developed as soon as practical. In accordance with the business case, an easy to use web interface will follow and two additional stages investigated subsequently. The initial stage will result in access to the tabled documents through the APH website and will be ongoing from the date the series is implemented. The additional stages to be further investigated include digital access to other tabled papers and the back capturing of the documents which form the PPS to date.

Recommendation 2
The committee recommends that the parliamentary departments undertake a business case to examine issues relating to the maintenance of electronic records and long-term archival requirements that would be required in developing an electronic PPS.

The recommendation has been implemented.

Recommendation 3
The committee recommends that the parliamentary departments develop a digital repository for the PPS based in the Parliament.

Agreed. The Presiding Officers note that while the digital repository is to be based in the Parliament, the responsibility for providing the information in a timely manner resides with the author agencies. The Presiding Officers note the AGIMO requirement for departments and agencies to ensure that the on-line versions of documents tabled in Parliament are identical to those that are posted on their websites. This existing requirement provides surety of the content of the documents to be included in the ePPS.

Recommendation 4
The committee recommends that a business case, referred to in recommendation 2, also
include:

  • The scope for other tabled documents not in the PPS to be made available through the repository; and
  • The costs placed on the parliamentary departments to provide the repository.
The recommendation was implemented in the preparation of the business case.

Recommendation 5
The committee recommends that author departments and agencies be required to provide electronic copies of documents at the same time print copies are provided for tabling in the Parliament.

The Presiding Officers will ensure that electronic copies of documents prepared by either chamber department or the Department of Parliamentary Services, including parliamentary committees, are provided for inclusion in the ePPS.

It is noted that the government response to this recommendation indicates that the electronic documents will not be provided prior to tabling.

Recommendation 6
The committee recommends that a digital repository for the PPS be in production and accessible to users by early 2011, to coincide with the start of the 2011 PPS.

This recommendation could not be met.

Recommendation 7
The committee recommends that the chamber departments administer a digital repository for the PPS.

Agreed. The Presiding Officers support the administration of the digital repository for the ePPS by the Department of the Senate and the Department of the House of Representatives.

The Presiding Officers note that the parliamentary departments have jointly considered the most cost effective means to introduce the new format and that it will use IT services supported by the Department of Parliamentary Services. ...

From: Presiding Officers' – further response, Joint Committee on Publications, Australian Parliament, June 2012 (PDF 46KB)

Saturday, July 28, 2012

e-Tabling Documents for Australian Parliament

This is to propose that the Australian Parliament change its procedures to allow the tabling of electronic, rather than paper, documents. This will reduce cost and resource use, as well as improve the readability of the documents.

Currently the Parliament forces a wasteful duplication on agencies, which are required to prepare documents on paper for tabling, along with an electronic version for the public after tabling. Most of the paper copies printed are probably never opened, let alone read. Also, because the Parliament requires the electronic version to closely match the paper edition, the design of the electronic version cannot be optimized for on-line viewing.

I suggest the priority be reversed, with the agencies producing an electronic document, which is also suitable for printing. This will allow the design to be optimized for on-line viewing. The printed document will not look as well laid out as one specifically designed for print, but will be usable.

Converting to electronic tabling would require a few small changes to the wording of procedures. The "Guidelines for the Presentation of Documents to the Parliament" could be changed slightly to remove mention of "printing":
"... Documents should be printed created in accordance with standards prepared by the Joint Publications Committee ..."
The Parliamentary Papers Series (PPS) procedures require 100 copies of documents to be delivered to a location in Canberra for distribution. These complex and expensive procedures could be replaced with a simpler procedure, where one electronic copy of the document is delivered to parliament and distributed via the parliamentary web site.

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

Paperless Office Nearer Reality

According to the report "The Paper Free Office - dream or reality?" (by Doug Miles, AIIM, February 2012), some progress has been made with reducing paper in the office. The report is available free from AIIM (1.3 Mbyte PDF 28 Pages). The report finds that the consumption of paper and the number of photocopies is decreasing many organizations, but many borne digital documents end up being printed and then scanned back in at some time during their lifetime. The report is useful, but not without flaws, for example the report confuses digital signatures with digitized signatures.
Key Findings
  • There is less paper floating around the office – especially in the biggest organizations. The consumption of paper and the number of photocopies is decreasing in 35% of organizations, whereas it is increasing in 32%. In the largest organizations, the net proportion of respondents posting a decrease is 15%.
  • Electronic-only filing would halve the storage space needed for paper in 5 years. The average proportion of office space taken up by paper is now 15.3%, and it would drop to 7.4% with an all-electronic filing policy, a saving of nearly 8% in overall office costs.
  • On average, 45% of documents that are scanned are 100% “born digital” – just as they came from the printer. And many of the rest would be all-digital if not for the added signatures.
  • 77% of invoices that arrive as PDF attachments get printed. 31% of faxed invoices get printed and scanned back in. On average, 30% of invoices arrive as PDF attachments, and 15% as faxes.
  • 41% of organizations in the survey are using some form of digital-mailroom, either as a centralized operation or distributed at branch offices. 4% are outsourced.
  • 20% of organizations scan half or more of their inbound mail at or before entry. A further 20% are more likely to scan at the point-of-process, and 29% scan-to-archive after the process.
  • Improved sharability and searchability is the biggest driver for investment in scanning and capture. Followed by improved productivity and reduced storage space.
  • On average, respondents using scanning and capture consider that it improves the speed of response to customers, suppliers, citizens or staff by 6-times or more. 70% estimate an improvement of at least 3-times, and nearly a third (29%) see an improvement of 10-times or more.
  • 42% of users have achieved a payback period of 12 months or less from their scanning and capture investments. 57% are posting a payback of 18-months or less.
  • A net of 13% of respondents plan to increase their use of bureaus or document process outsource (DPO), particularly in Europe (net 21%). But only a net of 1% will be increasing their offshore activities.
  • 38% of respondents have employees equipped to use portable devices to capture documents or forms when not at their desks. Over 14% are using portable scanners for forms and supporting documents. 6% are using smartphones or tablets, including 4% who use OCR to capture data at the device.
  • Over half of those using portable devices capture signatures, either by scanning (30%), stylus (11%) or using a digital signature app (21%).
  • Speed of data availability and keeping paper out of the process are given as the biggest advantages of mobile capture, followed by better data accuracy and fewer lost or incomplete forms.
  • 12% of respondents are committed to a strategy of cloud deployment of capture – rising to 20% of the largest organizations. 18% overall have firmly decided against it and 39% are waiting for a company decision on cloud in general (27%), or capture specifically (12%).
  • Spending predictions indicate a considerable increase in spend on capture software, including mobile capture and as a front-end to SharePoint. A net of 23% of responding organizations indicate increased spend for the next 12 months. Spend on scanners is set to be stable, while spend on outsourcing is set to decrease. ...
From: The Paper Free Office - dream or reality?, Doug Miles, AIIM, February 2012

Friday, December 02, 2011

Finding Meaning in Electronic Documents

Greetings from the Sixteenth Australasian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS 2011) at the Australian National University in Canberra. This is being held in conjunction with the 2011 Australasian Language Technology Workshop (ALTA). ADCS is about how to construct, store, manage, use and find electronic documents. But it is also about how to extract meaning from e-documents. That may sound very academic, but this is worth billions of dollars for social media companies (the event is sponsored by Google and NICTA). ADCS is free and there are some spare seats, so if you happen to be in Canberra, and have an interest in the field, come along.

ps: A question I have is why are academic papers eight pages long? Is this due to the mechanics of paper based printing and so no longer relevant, or is eight pages a good size for people to read?

Conference Schedule

8:40Registration
9:00Welcome
9:10Session 1: ADCS/ALTA Joint Session (Chair: David Martinez)

  1. Li Wang, Diana Mccarthy and Timothy Baldwin. Predicting Thread Linking Structure by Lexical Chaining
  2. Diego Molla and Maria Elena Santiago-Martinez. Development of a Corpus for Evidence Based Medicine Summarisation
  3. Mike Symonds, Peter Bruza, Laurianne Sitbon and Ian Turner. Tensor Query Expansion: A cognitively motivated relevance model
  4. Yan Shen, Yuefeng Li, Yue Xu, Renato Lannella, Abdulmohsen Algarni and Xiaohui Tao. An Ontology-based Mining Approach for User Search Intent Discovery
10:40Morning Tea
11:10Session 2 (Chair: Sally Jo Cunningham)

  1. David Alexander, Andrew Trotman and Alistair Knott. Click Log Based Evaluation of Link Discovery
  2. Xiang-Fei Jia, Andrew Trotman and Jason Holdsworth. Fast Search Engine Vocabulary Lookup
  3. (*) Amir Hadad, Alexander Krumpholz, Nina Studeny, Tom Gedeon and David Hawking. Automatic identification of the most important elements in an XML collection
12:00Industry Keynote: Simon Kravis, Fujitsu Australia (Chair: Paul Thomas)

  • Information Retrieval in Large Organisations.
    Information retrieval within large organisations is usually from repositories with little or no hyperlinking of documents. Tools which are successful for public-facing web sites are frequently unsuccessful inside organisations through poor ranking of search results, high levels of duplication and near-duplication and the frequent occurrence of documents which are not completely described by the text which they contain. Metadata-based retrieval is limited by poor coverage from manually assigned metadata and the limited availability of automated metadata assignment.
12:45Lunch
14:00Session 3 (Chair: Falk Scholer)

  1. Shane Culpepper, Michiko Yasukawa and Falk Scholer. Language Independent Ranked Retrieval with NeWT
  2. David Bainbridge and Sally Jo Cunningham. A Workflow for Document Level Interoperability
  3. Iman Amini, Alexandra Uidtenbogerd and Mark Sanderson. The Interplay of Information Retrieval and Query by Singing With Words
  4. (*) Timothy Jones, Paul Thomas, David Hawking and Ramesh Sankaranarayana. The usefulness of web spam
  5. (*) Su Nam Kim, Timothy Baldwin and Lawrence Cavedon. Harvesting Domain-Specific Terms using Wikipedia
15:20Afternoon Tea
15:50Session 4 (Chair: Andrew Turpin)

  1. Nicholas Sherlock and Andrew Trotman. Efficient sorting of search results by string attributes
  2. Laurence Park. Examining document model residuals to provide feedback during Information Retrieval evaluation
  3. Guido Zuccon, Anthony Nguyen, Teerapong Leelanupab and Leif Azzopardi. Indexing without Spam
  4. (*) Darren Wei-Che Huang, Shlomo Geva, Andrew Trotman and Kelly Y. Itakura. Mobile Applications of Focused Link Discovery
  5. (*) Kelly Itakura and Shlomo Geva. Six Degrees of Cohesion in Patent Citation Network
17:20ADCS Business Meeting

Friday, November 18, 2011

Australian Government Cloud Computing Guidelines

The Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) and National Archives of Australia has released a series of cloud computing guides for comment. But there are so few suitable government applications for cloud computing, that perhaps the guides should concentrate on those. The cloud technology could be applied within computer systems under government control, but generally government data (and the data the government holds about its citizens) is not suitable for placing on a distributed, shared, global computer system.
  1. Privacy and Cloud Computing for Australian Government Agencies PDF 255KB
  2. Negotiating the Cloud – Legal Issues in Cloud Computing Agreements PDF 395KB
  3. Financial Considerations for Government use of Cloud Computing PDF 236KB
  4. Records Management and the Cloud, National Archives of Australia website.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Document Computing Symposium

The Sixteenth Australasian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS 2011) will be held at the Australian National Unviersity in Canberra on Friday 2 December 2011 and is free, but you need to register.

ADCS 2011 is an opportunity for researchers and practitioners in document management and information retrieval to meet and present their work. The symposium aims to cover all aspects of Document Computing - issues ranging from the fundamentals of document architectures and standards for markup, through storage, management, retrieval, authentication and workflow, to active and virtual documents. The symposium emphasises both commercial and academic issues by encouraging a variety of submissions.

Topics of interest

  • Cognitive Aspects of Documents
  • Digital Libraries
  • Document Databases
  • Document Management
  • Document Standards (XML, SGML etc)
  • Document Workflow
  • Information Retrieval
  • Multimedia Document Management
  • Multimedia Resource Discovery
  • Natural Language Techniques and Documents
  • Personalised Documents
  • User Studies Involving Documents
  • Web Documents

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Information Management Education

Greetings from the National Archives of Australia in Canberra, where the Records Management Association of Australasia is hosting "ACT Education Pathways". I will be speaking about information management at ANU. Also speaking are people from Canberra Institute of Technology up to Certificate IV, University of Canberra Master of Information Studies, Aurora Foundation Ltd, National Archives of Australia Short Courses, Charles Stuart University.

NAA are planning to run courses in 2012 on digital information records (2 days) and metadata (half day). This is of interest as I have been teaching about these at ANU.

NAA are also looking at providing courses by webinar. CIT hold classes for 49 weeks a year.
University of Canberra, like ANU, use the Moodle Learning Management System for teaching.

What might influence information management and record keeping in the public service is the Cyber white paper being prepared for release in early 2012.

Monday, November 07, 2011

Education Pathways for Records and Information Management Professionals

The Records Management Association of Australasia is hosting "ACT Education Pathways" at the National Archives of Australia offices in Canberra, Thursday 10 November 2011. I will be speaking about options at ANU. The ANU has two courses specifically designed for records/information managers (offered subject to demand):
  1. Electronic Document and Records Management (COMP7420): An open access copy of my Notes for Electronic Document and Records Management Course are available on-line.
  2. Data Mining and Matching (COMP7410)
The ANU also runs Public Policy Short Courses: One half to three day courses. Credit towards Diploma, Certificate, or Master of Studies, for two and a half or longer days study.

The Graduate Studies Select program allows a student to custom design their own Certificate, Diploma and Masters program, incorporating the above courses and others from ANU. This includes the option of on-line courses from ANU , University of Southern Queensland (USQ) and Charles Darwin University (CDU).


Education Pathways for Records and Information Management Professionals

By Tom Worthington FACS CP

Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, The Australian National University

For "ACT Education Pathways" by the Records Management Association of Australasia iat the National Archives of Australia offices in Canberra,

Thursday 10 November 2011



The ANU has two courses specifically designed for records/information managers (offered subject to demand):

  1. Electronic Document and Records Management (COMP7420): http://studyat.anu.edu.au/courses/COMP7420;details.html

    Web 2.0 and social networking have created a demand for rapid access to information in commercial and not-for-profit organisations. Government 2.0 provides open access and greater involvement in the decision making of government. Smart phones and tablet computers using wireless networks allow mobile access to cloud computing resources world wide. This poses a challenge for organisations to provide access and input, while maintaining the security and integrity of records, and the privacy of personal information. This course investigates how traditional records management techniques and document formats have been adapted to the Internet era.
    An open access copy of my Notes for Electronic Document and Records Management Course are available on-line: http://www.tomw.net.au/emanagement/

  2. Data Mining and Matching (COMP7410): http://studyat.anu.edu.au/courses/COMP7410;details.html

    Large amounts of data are increasingly being collected by public and private organisations, and research projects. The Internet as well provides a very large source of information about almost every aspect of human life and society. This course provides an overview of the technologies and concepts used for data mining and matching. It focuses on the practical aspects of these techniques rather than the mathematical and statistical foundation.

The ANU also runs Public Policy Short Courses. One half to three day courses. Credit towards Diploma, Certificate, or Master of Studies, for two and a half or longer days study http://publicpolicy.anu.edu.au/education/courses.php


These courses are general workshops with 15–20 participants per session. These courses do not need prior knowledge or experience in public policy and are a foundation for an understanding of public policy and developing further knowledge. They are suitable for APS officers 4, 5 and 6, or staff at higher levels who may be unfamiliar with the policy process or are moving into a policy role from another area in the APS.

The
Graduate Studies Select program allows a student to custom design their own Certificate, Diploma and Masters program, incorporating the above courses and others from ANU. This includes the option of on-line courses from ANU , University of Southern Queensland (USQ) and Charles Darwin University (CDU): http://studyat.anu.edu.au/graduate_studies.html


Graduate Studies Select is a new option for graduate studies at ANU. It recognises that graduate students have a range of professional and personal needs and that these cannot always be met by following a program of study in a single academic discipline. Subject to meeting course entry requirements, you will be able to select courses from across the graduate course offerings available.

This opportunity increases the flexibility and choice available to you. Graduate Studies Select allows you to structure your studies and direct your learning in a way which meets your academic, personal and professional interests and enables you to develop skills and expertise in a range of learning areas.

For example, you could construct a program of study comprising courses in art history, environmental science, finance and management.

A suite of new academic awards has been created for students who choose Graduate Studies Select. Students will be enrolled in the Graduate Studies Program, and may elect to take out the Certificate of Graduate Studies, the Diploma of Graduate Studies, the Master of Studies, the Master of Advanced Studies or the Master of Studies with Research.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Learning to Cope with Corporate e-Records

I will be speaking about my ANU Electronic Document and Records Management Course at the free Records and Information Management Professionals Australasia Seminar, 12 Noon, 10 November 2011, in Canberra.
Educational Pathways ACT Branch Seminar

Event details

If you’re considering further education in the field of records and information management, this is your opportunity to explore and discuss your options.

Representatives from various learning institutes will be available for you to discuss your education options from Certificate III through to Masters and PhDs and Leadership training.

Educational Institutes & Learning Pathways

Presenting:

  • Australian National University
  • Canberra Institute of Technology
  • Charles Sturt University
  • Canberra University
  • Aurora Leadership Foundation
  • National Archives Australia
  • Anne Beasley – a student’s experience ...

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Australian National University Seeks Electronic Document System Implementer

The Australian National University (ANU) has advertised for an Electronic Document and Records Management System (EDRMS) implementer.

Assistant Manager (G510-11AM)

University Records, Division of Information, ANU Central Services

University Records seeks an experienced EDRMS implementer and records management professional to join an energetic team in moving the University into a digital environment.

LocationCanberra/ACT
Term of ContractPermanent
GradeANU Officer Grade 8 (Administration)
Salary Package$80,001 - $85,757 pa plus 17% superannuation
Closing Date30 October 2011
Position OverviewApplications are invited for the above opportunity within University Records. The successful applicant will be experienced in the development of policies and procedures with a focus on the electronic environment, the implementation and maintenance of an EDRMS, as well as the management of a small team ensuring objectives are achieved.

University Records is the central area responsible for the development of the University's information management policies and procedures. In addition, University Records carries responsibilities for the specification and implementation of an Electronic Document and Records Management System (EDRMS), the processing and management of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and the management of the University's records.

This position will contribute to the development, implementation and revision of University wide policies, guidelines and procedures for records and information management, including compliance with legislation, disposal authorities and requirements for electronic records. This position also contributes to the strategic planning of records management services and provides strategic and procedural advice to the Office of the Vice-Chancellor and the University Community and stakeholders.

Enquiries: Cameron Neal T: (02) 6125 4237
E: cameron.neal@anu.edu.au
Additional InformationPEWER signed.pdf
Position description
Responsible toManager, University Records
Role statement1. Under the broad direction of the Manager, University Records manage the operations of and supervise staff in University Records, including supervising the completion of more complex work and projects.

2. Identify training needs, develop training programs and deliver staff training in the use of records related functions including the ANU Information Management Vocabulary, disposal authorities and automated recordkeeping systems.

3. Contribute to the design and implementation of an EDRMS for the University, including change management processes, and direct the systems administration of the University's EDRMS, including the ongoing management and process improvement.

4. Liaise with clients to assess their records management requirements and provide relevant advice.

5.Contribute to the development and review of work practices, records procedures and guidelines.

6. Undertake the completion and management of FOI requests to the University.

7. Represent University Records at relevant forums in the University as well as with external agencies such as the National Archives of Australia and commercial providers.
Selection criteria

1. Progress towards postgraduate qualifications in a relevant field with subsequent relevant experience, or an equivalent combination of experience and training.

2. Proven leadership expertise and experience in staff management including the development of subordinate staff.

3. Well-developed analytical skills, including an ability to interpret the legislative framework relevant to the field of information management and implement policy and processes to meet the University's needs.

4. Extensive relevant experience in the implementation, administration and use of Electronic Document and Records Management Systems coupled with the ability to communicate effectively with IT specialists.

5. Highly developed written and oral communication skills together with the ability to negotiate effectively with senior managers and client groups, and deliver training programs.

6. Proven ability to set priorities, work effectively in a team environment and use initiative to make sound judgments.

7. High-level customer focus in the delivery of administrative services, an ability to adapt to a changing work environment and to lead change management processes.

8. A demonstrated high-level understanding of equal opportunity principles and a commitment to the application of EO policies in a university context.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

ACT Government Records Digitisation Standard

The Territory Records Office of the Australian Capital Territory has issued a series of standards for records management and more recently for electronic records. These standards apply to local government agencies in Canberra. They are based on these used by the Austrlaian Government. It is not clear if the ACT really needs its own standards (being essentially a city council). They may be better off just using the federal standards, or those of a state government, unaltered. However, the standards are well written and very readable, providing a good overview of the topic:
  1. Territory Records Standard - Number 1 : Records Management Programs
  2. Territory Records Standard - Number 2 : Appraisal
  3. Territory Records Standard - Number 3 : Records Description and Control
  4. Territory Records Standard - Number 4 : Access
  5. Territory Records Standard - Number 5 : Recordkeeping and Outsourced Government Business
  6. Territory Records Standard - Number 6 : Digital Records
  7. Territory Records Standard - Number 7 : Physical Storage of Records
  8. Territory Records Standard - Number 8 : Business Continuity and Records Management
  9. Territory Records Standard - Number 9 : Records Digitisation and Conversion

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Information Publication Scheme Draft Agency Plan

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has issued a "Information Publication Scheme Draft Agency Plan" for comment by 28 March 2011. The document describes how the OAIC proposes to provide details of its own information. The document discusses information architecture, what information is to be published including that required by the FOI Act, accessibility, compliance review and how to promote community engagement. The OAIC clearly is intending to set an example for other agencies to follow. Unfortunately the good information and intentions of the OAIC have been let down by the poor way the document has been formatted. I suggest OAIC adopt Australian Government standard document formats, and so set a good example to other agencies.

This is a 19 page document supplied in PDF (449kbytes) and RTF (20Mbytes) formats. Clearly there is a fault in the formatting of the RTF file, resulting an excessively sized document (about 10 times larger than it need be).

When saved as an ODF text document (the format used by National Archives of Australia) for long term preservation of government documents, the files is 747 kbytes. An examination of the contents of the ODF file indicate that most of the file size is due to incorrectly formatted logos. The factual content of the document is only about 25 kbytes.

I suggest the OAIC abandon the use of PDF and RTF for publishing documents and instead provide accessible, well structured web pages (in HTML). Such documents will be easier top maintain and read.

More generally I suggest that the OAIC and agencies providing FOI Disclosure Logs and other information for the public adopt the metadata standards and document formats recommended by the National Archives of Australia (NAA) for the long term preservation of government records. The documents which are required to be provided under FOI legislation are a subset of those held by government agencies. Eventually those documents will be required to be transferred to the NAA, along with metadata describing them. NAA has established technical standards for the metadata and documents, in accordance with international records management standards. NAA has also produced free open source software to aid this process.

Rather than have OAIC and other government agency create documents in one format and then some time later have them converted for archiving, I suggest agencies use the standard metadata and formats for storage of the documents internally. These then can be provided to the public without the need for conversion and eventually transferred to NAA.

I suggest OAIC abandon the use of PDF and RTF for providing documents. Instead documents can be provided as web pages. This will make the files supplied much smaller and easier to read. In supplying metadata about documents, such as in a document log, I suggest the OAIC use the same metadata standards issued by NAA for records management. This data can be supplied in the form of automatically generated web pages, as well as machine readable formats.

For an overview of the technology and techniques behind this approach see the notes for the postgraduate course COMP7420 "Electronic Document and Records Management,", for the Graduate Studies Select program, College of Engineering & Computer Science, the Australian National University, 2011.

To demonstrate how documents can be provided is web format, here is the text of the OAIC's paper, created by coping and pasting from the RTF version:
Information Publication Scheme

Draft agency plan

March 2011

Contents

Introduction

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) is an agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) and is required to comply with the Information Publication Scheme (IPS) requirements. This agency plan describes how the OAIC proposes to do this, as required by s 8(1) of the FOI Act.

The OAIC is an independent statutory agency established by the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010. It is headed by the Australian Information Commissioner, supported by two other statutory office holders: the Freedom of Information Commissioner and the Privacy Commissioner.

The Information Commissioner and the Freedom of Information Commissioner have oversight responsibilities in relation to the IPS under the FOI Act. These responsibilities are not covered in this plan. Instead, the Information Commissioner and the Freedom of Information Commissioner are generally referred to in their capacity as leaders of the OAIC, and not in their regulatory capacity under the FOI Act.

The agency plan describes how the OAIC proposes to implement and administer the IPS in respect of its own information holdings, by addressing:

  • establishing and administering the OAIC's IPS contribution

  • information architecture

  • information required to be published

  • other information to be published (optional information)

  • accessibility to information published

  • compliance review

  • better practice initiatives including promoting community engagement.

The OAIC will continue to build and foster a culture within the agency, in which appropriate proactive disclosure of its information holdings is embraced, leading to successful implementation and administration of the IPS. This is in recognition that public sector information is a national resource managed for public purposes.

Purpose

The purpose of this agency plan is to:

  • assist the OAIC in planning and developing its contribution to the IPS

  • facilitate public consultation about that contribution

  • show what information the agency proposes to publish (referred to as the IPS information holdings), how and to whom the information will be published and how the OAIC will otherwise comply with the IPS requirements (s 8(1)).

Note: in this plan, information to be published by the OAIC under the IPS is referred to as the IPS information holdings, or as the IPS documents when referring to individual documents.

Objectives

The OAIC's objectives are to outline appropriate mechanisms and procedures to:

  • manage the IPS information holdings

  • proactively identify and publish all information required to be published (s 8(2))

  • proactively identify and publish any optional information to be published (s 8(4))

  • review and ensure on a regular basis that information published under the IPS is accurate, up to date and complete (s 8B)

  • ensure that information published under the IPS is easily discoverable, understandable, machine-readable, re-useable and transformable

  • ensure satisfactory conformance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Version 2) (WCAG 2.0)

  • measure the success of the OAIC's IPS contribution by reference to community feedback and compliance review processes

  • adopt best practice initiatives in implementing and administering the OAIC's contribution to the IPS.

Establishing and administering the OAIC's IPS contribution

The Freedom of Information Commissioner is designated by the OAIC as the senior officer responsible for leading the OAIC's compliance with the IPS - the OAIC IPS Leader.

(a) Establishing the OAIC's IPS contribution by 1 May 2011

The IPS Leader is supported by the IPS Steering Group and IPS Project Team to establish the OAIC's contribution to the IPS by 1 May 2011.

The IPS Steering Group comprises:

  • the Assistant Commissioner, Operations

  • the Assistant Commissioner, Policy

  • the IPS Project Manager

  • the Director of Corporate and Public Affairs.

The IPS Steering Group will set up other ad hoc working groups as required.

The IPS Project Team comprises:

  • a Director, retained on a temporary basis, to establish the OAIC's IPS contribution (among other responsibilities)

  • staff with information technology expertise to publish the relevant documents

  • staff from the OAIC's Compliance, Policy and Operations branches as required.

The IPS Project Team has prepared an IPS project plan for tasks to be completed by 1 May 2011, including:

  • the OAIC's goals in relation to the IPS

  • a timetable for achieving those goals

  • how the OAIC will achieve those goals (ie tasks to be completed and responsibility for each goal).

The project team has developed a draft register of information required or permitted to be published under s 8(2) and 8(4) (the draft Register).

To prepare the draft register, the IPS project team spent approximately two months:

  • auditing documents currently published on the OAIC website (www.oaic.gov.au) and identifying the documents that will form part of the IPS from 1 May 2011

  • creating a list of IPS documents (including those not already published on the OAIC website)

  • compiling a list of links to IPS documents on the OAIC's internal document management system that are not currently published on the OAIC website

  • compiling a set of hard copy IPS documents that are not published on the OAIC website and are not available on the OAIC document management system

  • identifying any IPS documents that are not accurate, up to date or complete

  • nominating a staff member responsible for ensuring a particular IPS document which was not accurate, up to date or complete, is revised by 1 May 2011.

The draft register facilitates compliance with WCAG 2.0 (see Objectives on page 2), as it:

  • describes the format of all IPS documents currently published on the OAIC websites

  • contains a link to an alternative format of an IPS document (preferably an RTF (rich text format) version), where the document is only available in Portable Document Format (PDF) on the OAIC website

  • contains a link to an RTF version and, if available, a searchable PDF for IPS documents that are not on the OAIC website

  • identifies any other issues that may affect publication of an IPS document on the OAIC website.

The IPS Steering Group has established a working group to consider and finalise the IPS documents to be included on the draft register. This group includes members of the steering group and a senior representative from the Compliance branch.

The IPS Project Team has arranged for public consultation on the Agency Plan in March 2011. This will take place by publishing the draft agency plan on the OAIC website and on the OAIC blog (http://govspace.gov.au/) to seek comments on the plan over a two-week period. The OAIC will promote consultation through news items on the OAIC govdex page (http://www.govdex.gov.au/), on the OAIC website, the OAIC blog and through the Information Contact Officer and IPS networks.

(b) Administering information published under the IPS from 1 May 2011

The OAIC will develop a comprehensive information management framework which will apply to OAIC information published under the IPS. This framework will initially comprise records management plans and policies which are currently under development. The OAIC also intends to develop plans and procedures to address other information asset issues, including intellectual property and copyright.

The OAIC will finalise its records management plans and policies as follows:

  • Records management plan (a project plan for the development of an OAIC Records disposal authority and OAIC Records management policy) - to be finalised within six months

  • OAIC Records authority and OAIC Records management policy - to be finalised in approximately 12 months.

From 1 May 2011, the OAIC's ongoing compliance with the IPS will be coordinated by an Information Champion - initially the Assistant Commissioner, Policy. This role will later transition to the Assistant Commissioner, Operations.

Each branch of the OAIC will be responsible as required, for day to day tasks associated with complying with the IPS. For example the Operations branch will manage ongoing administration of the IPS information holdings and will be responsible for implementing, reviewing and revising the agency plan.

As part of managing the ongoing administration of the IPS information holdings, the Operations branch (assisted by the Policy branch) will develop a Guide to publishing information under the IPS for OAIC staff. The guide will:

  • describe processes to be followed internally to ensure the accuracy, currency and completeness of published information

  • help staff to identify on an ongoing basis any required or optional information to be published under the IPS

  • describe the process for publishing information.

The Operations branch will lead better practice initiatives to engage with the community about the OAIC's contribution to the IPS. These include:

  • issuing a media release announcing the launch of the IPS

  • making IPS documents as easily discoverable, understandable and machine-readable as possible

  • inviting members of the public to contact the FOI contact officer via the OAIC website with comments on the IPS information holdings, particularly where documents are found not to be discoverable, understandable or machine-readable

  • publishing a feedback form on the IPS section of the OAIC website inviting users' comments.

The Operations branch will also arrange OAIC IPS documents, which are not available on the OAIC website, to be made available upon request.

The OAIC may charge a person for accessing any IPS document which it is impracticable to publish online:

  • at the lowest reasonable cost

  • to reimburse specific reproduction costs or other specific incidental costs (s 8D(4)).

The OAIC will publish on its website a list of any IPS documents that are impracticable to publish online. The website will state that a person seeking access to any of these documents may contact a Corporate and Public Affairs Officer to arrange access.

The list of documents will include indicative charges that may be imposed for making that information available and an explanation for the charge. These charges will be consistent with charges in the Freedom of Information (Charges) Regulations 1982 (which generally apply to access requests under Part III of the FOI Act). Annexure A lists the IPS documents which will not be available online as at 1 May 2011.

IPS information architecture

The OAIC will publish its IPS information holdings on its website in accordance with the timetable at Annexure B (except where this is impracticable).

The IPS information holdings that are available on the OAIC website, will be published under the following headings:

  • Agency plan (ss 8(2)(a)

  • Who we are (ss 8(2)(b) and 8(2)(d))

  • What we do (ss 8(2)(c) and 8(2)(j))

  • Our reports and responses to Parliament (ss 8(2)(e) and 8(2)(h))

  • Routinely requested information and disclosure log (ss 8(2)(g) and 11C)

  • Consultation arrangements (s 8(2)(f))

  • Our priorities (s 8(4))

  • Our finances (s 8(4))

  • Our lists (s 8(4))

  • Contact us (s 8(2)(i)).

To ensure that the IPS information holdings (and individual IPS documents) are easily discoverable, understandable and machine-readable, the OAIC will:

  • publish an IPS icon on the homepage of its website, which will link to the IPS section of the website

  • design and publish an IPS entry point on its website

  • wherever possible, provide online content in a format that can be searched, copied and transformed

  • publish a sitemap for its website, to help individuals identify the location of information published under ss 8(2) and 8(4)

  • provide a search function for its website

  • provide an alert service to notify subscribers of new publications under the IPS or other developments in relation to the OAIC's contribution to the IPS

  • establish links to this agency plan and to the sitemap at www.directory.gov.au

  • seek and respond to community feedback about whether the IPS information holdings (and individual IPS documents) are easily discoverable, understandable and machine-readable.

The OAIC will make its IPS documents available on the IPS section of the website in two ways:

  • documents that were published on the OAIC website before 1 April 2011 will be made available through a link from the IPS section

  • documents that were published on the OAIC website on or after 1 April 2011 will be published in the IPS section.

The OAIC will, so far as possible, make its IPS information holdings available for reuse on open licensing terms.

Where the OAIC has deposited or published IPS documents under a scheme such as the Commonwealth Library Deposit, the National Sound and Film Archive or www.data.gov.au, the OAIC will publish on its website information about the deposits (including links where available).

Information required to be published under the IPS

The OAIC will publish documents required to be published under the IPS (s 8(2)) in the IPS section of the website at www.oaic.gov.au/ips/.

The OAIC will publish these documents in accordance with the timeframe set out in Annexure B.

The OAIC will publish these documents under the following headings:

Agency plan

Who we are

  • This will include an organisation chart, the Agency Employment Agreement and information about statutory appointments.

  • For statutory appointees, the OAIC will publish the name of the person appointed, the length or term of appointment, the position to which the person is appointed (and particulars of the position) and the provision of the Act under which the person is appointed.

What we do

  • This will outline the functions and decision making powers of the Information Commissioner, Freedom of Information Commissioner, Privacy Commissioner, the Information Advisory Committee and the Privacy Advisory Committee.

  • The OAIC will also publish rules, guidelines, practices and precedents relating to these functions and powers. This includes guidelines issued under s 95AA of the Privacy Act 1988, the OAIC Enquiries line manual, guidelines in relation to determinations under s 52 of the Privacy Act 1988, Compliance complaint handling manual, Compliance freedom of information assessment template and Commonwealth spent convictions scheme exclusions.

Our reports and responses to Parliament

  • This will include the full text of the OAIC's (or the Office of the Privacy Commissioner's) recent annual reports (2008-2009 and 2009-2010) tabled in Parliament.

Routinely requested information

  • This will include information in documents to which the OAIC routinely gives access in response to FOI requests.

  • The OAIC will clearly identify these documents in its disclosure log, published under s 11C of the FOI Act - which requires agencies to publish information contained in documents to which the agency has provided access under the FOI Act.

Consultation

  • This will include information about how and to whom a comment may be submitted by members of the public, where the OAIC undertakes public consultation on a specific policy proposal.

Contact us

  • This will include the name, telephone number and an email address for a contact officer, who can be contacted about access to the OAIC's information or documents under the FOI Act. The OAIC will establish generic telephone numbers and email addresses for this purpose that will not change with staff movements.

Optional information to be published under the IPS

The OAIC will publish on the IPS section of its website other information that it holds (in addition to the information published under s 8(2)), taking into account the objects of the FOI Act (s 8(4)).

The OAIC will publish these documents in accordance with the timeframe set out in Attachment B.

Optional information will be published under the following headings:

Our priorities

  • This will include corporate and strategic plans, assessments and reviews.

Our finances

  • This will include financial information relating to pay and grading structures, procurement procedures, tendering and contracts.

Our lists

  • This will include agency contracts, grants and appointments, and links to data sets.

Our submissions

  • This will include submissions made by the OAIC (and the OPC) to Parliamentary committees, the Productivity Commissioner, the Australian Law Reform Commission and other agencies.

Our policies

  • This will include the OAIC's procurement, email and internet usage, harassment, maternity leave and workplace diversity policies.

In addition, in the IPS section the OAIC will publish a link to other publications not covered by these headings, including fact sheets, speeches and guidelines.

Accessibility under the IPS

(c) Approach to accessibility by commencement of the IPS

The OAIC will ensure that all online information it is required to publish under the IPS (s 8(2)) conforms with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Version 2) (WCAG 2.0) on commencement of the IPS (1 May 2011).

The OAIC will ensure that optional information published on its website conforms with WCAG 2.0 in accordance with the time frames in Annexure B.

The OAIC's dedicated IPS section of its website will state that where a document is not yet available in an accessible format, it will be made available in an accessible format on request, by contacting the Corporate and Public Affairs Officer (whose contact details will be provided). This may be subject to a small number of exceptions identified in Annexure B.

(d) Approach to accessibility after commencement of the IPS

From commencement of the IPS, the OAIC will publish any new IPS documents as soon as they are available for publication.

The OAIC will ensure that all information newly published on the OAIC website conforms with the WCAG 2.0 as soon as possible.

IPS compliance review

The OAIC will review and revise this agency plan at least annually, which will coincide with the OAIC's strategic planning process.

The OAIC will review the operation of its IPS from time to time and at least every five years, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner about IPS compliance review (better practice guidance material to assist agencies to comply with the IPS - to be published in the Information Commissioner's regulatory capacity).

Annexure A

Access charges for documents not available on the website

No.

Document title

Date

Format

Charges

1.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner annual reports

1988-1989, 1989-1990, 1990-1991, 1991-1992, 1992-1993, 1993-1994, 1994-1995, 1995-1996, 1996-1997

Photocopy

10 cents per page




Copy (other than photocopy)

$4.40 per page




Copy of the document in the form of a computer tape or a computer disk

An amount not exceeding the actual costs incurred by the OAIC in producing the copy




Copy of the document to be sent to the applicant by post or delivered to the applicant

An amount not exceeding the cost of postage or delivery

Annexure B

Indicative timetable - WCAG 2.0 conformance

The OAIC will ensure, to the extent possible, that all documents available on its website before 1 April 2011 conform with WCAG 2.0 in accordance with the following timetable (subject to exceptions described below):

No.

Document category

Format

Indicative WCAG 2.0 conformance date

1.

All documents required to be published under s 8(2)

RTF, PDF and HTML

18 April 2011

2.

Optional information published under s 8(4)

RTF, PDF and HTML

1 September 2011

The majority of documents listed on the IPS section of the OAIC website will be converted into HTML to meet accessibility requirements. A small number of exceptions may apply to:

  • PDFs made of images of scanned documents

  • Documents that are out of date, but that are provided for historical reference (these will be supplied in the formats in which they are currently available)

  • Charts, tables and forms (these can be supplied in accessible formats on request).

Where possible, documents covered by these exceptions will be published in two alternative formats.

The OAIC will use an automatic word converter and PDF converter to convert a document into HTML. These documents will be proof read and new metadata applied.

The OAIC will ensure that all new documents to be published in the IPS section after 1 April 2011 conform with WCAG 2.0 as soon as possible.

From: Information Publication Scheme Draft Agency Plan, Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, March 2011